War on Terrorism: The Modern Perspective
-
War on Terrorism: Then and Now
-
Waging War: Considering the Key Arguments
-
Conclusion
-
References
The terrorist attack that occurred on September 11, 2001, has changed the perspective of American citizens on the phenomenon of terrorism and its implications forever. What seemed to be a horrendous yet distant notion has become a devastating part of reality, thus becoming a painful legacy of the American history (Maogoto, 2016). Despite the increasing threat and the drastic outcomes that the war on terrorism implies, the United States should continue promoting it as a response toward inhumane practices used by terrorists.
tailored to your instructions
for only $13.00 $11.05/page
War on Terrorism: Then and Now
The concept of the war on terrorism has undergone significant changes since the United States experienced terrorist acts. While the first responses could be described as emotional and required an immediate action, the current trend appears to encompass a wider range of ideas (Maogoto, 2016). The rational approach toward promoting peace seems to dominate the contemporary concept of the war on terrorism, although military actions are also deemed as necessary.
Waging War: Considering the Key Arguments
The war on terrorism will inevitably entail losses and may be interpreted as the means of restricting the principles of the American democracy. From the specified perspective, the very concept of the war on terrorism is a losing battle (Cohen, 2016). However, if considering the war on terrorism as the philosophy that encourages a humanistic approach toward managing political relationships and social interactions, it can be seen as the tool for enhancing security. Thus, the war on terrorism should be regarded as the enhancement of the existing ideas of democracy.
Conclusion
The U.S. should pursue the concept of the war on terrorism as a larger notion that implies both military practices and a change in the social perspective on the subject matter, thus encouraging humanistic viewpoints worldwide. By opposing the very idea of terrorism, the U.S. will reduce the support thereof on a global scale and promote a humanistic mode of thinking among the participants of the international dialogue. As a result, a positive change in the safety and security levels can be expected.
References
Cohen, S. (2016). Democracies at war against terrorism: A comparative perspective. New York, NY: Springer.
Maogoto, J. N. (2016). Battling terrorism: Legal perspectives on the use of force and the war on terror. New York, NY: Routledge.
